______________________________________________________________________
NPK-info 23-01-2005- Nederlands Palestina Komitee / www.palestina-komitee.nl
______________________________________________________________________
N.B.
- The United Nations' New Failure: Compensations Instead of Rights?! PressRelease, Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign, January 14th, 2005 http://stopthewall.org/latestnews/845.shtml
Zie hierna ook voor acties.
- Call for Action at 2005 World Social Forum: END THE ISRAELI MILITARY OCCUPATION http://www.badil.org/Publications/Press/2005/press373-05.htm
- En Nederland ....... helpt Israel, wat er ook gebeurt [muur,
nederzettingenuitbouw, ....]
http://www.minbuza.nl/default.asp?CMS_ITEM=550E0423B0A548DEA55B2DF73927FCECX3X59239X78 Actueel - Israel plans big Jerusalem land grab, Laila El-Haddad, 20-1-2005 http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/0B317D0C-9689-43F0-B773-E6A833C8F296.htm
- Gov't decision strips Palestinians of their East J'lem property,
20-1,
By Meron Rapport, Haaretz Correspondent http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/529510.html
- Mass hypnosis in the Middle East
Hasan Abu Nimah & Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 19 January 2005 http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3541.shtml
- What "Peace" Really Means to Israelis
Avigail Abarbanel, The Electronic Intifada, 21 January 2005 http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3548.shtml
- Departing head of UN refugee agency decries conditions in Gaza
as
horrendous Genevieve Cora Fraser, The Electronic Intifada, 18 January 2005 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A51887-2002Jan15¬Found=true
Nogmaals
- Want Security? End the Occupation, Marwan Barghouti, January 16,
2002,
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3542.shtml NPK/WL, 23-1-2005 ______________________________________________________________________ The Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign Demands that the UN Enforce the ENTIRE ICJ Ruling Against the Apartheid Wall! The UN has published a plan to install register offices in the West Bank to list damages caused by the Apartheid Wall, in order to compensate the Palestinian population. This was seemingly to "enforce" the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the illegality of the Apartheid Wall, the settlement policy, and the Occupation. The ICJ did rule for compensation, but called for this in parallel with international pressure to force Israel into respect for international law. So what has happened to this essential part of the ICJ ruling? Here is the full list of articles in the original ICJ ruling: ˇ Israel is under an obligation to terminate its breaches of international law; it is under an obligation to cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall being built in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, to dismantle forthwith the structure therein situated, and to repeal or render ineffective forthwith all legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto, in accordance with paragraph 151 of this Opinion; ˇ Israel is under an obligation to make reparation for all damage caused by the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem; ˇ All States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction; all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 have in addition the obligation, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention; ˇ The United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and the associated régime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion. If it was truly serious about enforcing this decision in its entirety, as it is obliged to do, the UN would begin to take steps forcing Israel to stop the Wall and dismantle the completed parts. But rather than mobilizing the pressure of the international community against Israel's violations of international law, the UN is offering Palestinians nothing but another relief office, similar to the one created for refugees after the 1948 Occupation. As in the case of the refugees, the UN reduces its role when it comes to Palestinian rights to the "humanitarian" side-another step in turning the Palestinian cause into a "humanitarian" case that can be "solved" with a dose of international aid. Once again, donor countries will be the ones paying for Israel's violations of international law. This approach ignores the fact that the Palestinian cause is a people's struggle for their rights, and that the UN's role should not be merely about providing food baskets and tents to those whose lives are destroyed by the Occupation. Its role must be to defend international law by upholding the rights of the Palestinian people. What is clear is that as long as construction of the Apartheid Wall continues, and as long as any completed part of the Wall still stands, these proposed compensations will be transformed from being part of the ICJ's decision into the decision itself. Compensation for damages cannot be the starting point from which the UN will fully implement the ICJ's decision. For the UN to start from the point that should be the last must be understood as a recognition and acceptance of what the Occupation creates on the ground, rather than an attempt to enforce the ICJ's decision. By establishing a register of damages, the UN is trying to sell a willingness to "compensate" people for the lands confiscated for the Wall as a substitute for actually stopping and dismantling the Wall. This decision must be understood as an attempt to legitimize the theft and dispossession that is the whole reason for the existence of the Apartheid Wall in the first place, and gives the illusion of legality to an illegal reality. Therefore, the Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign, which represents a number of major Palestinian civil society organizations and over 50 regional popular committees, is issuing an immediate call for action in order to protest this attempt by the UN to avoid its responsibility to enforce implementation of the ICJ ruling. WE DEMAND THAT THE UNITED NATIONS FINALLY TAKE SERIOUSLY ITS OBLIGATION TO FORCE ISRAEL TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ITS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, BY ENFORCING THE ICJ RULING AGAINST THE APARTHEID WALL, THE SETTLEMENT POLICY, AND THE OCCUPATION IN ITS ENTIRETY! We call on all organizations and individuals dedicated to social justice take action now to make the UN hear this call. Send letters of protest to Kofi Annan and other UN officials, to the European Union, to the political representatives in your country, to the press-anywhere you can. THIS ATTEMPT TO UNDERMINE THE ICJ RULING, AND TO ALLOW THE CRIMINAL APARTHEID WALL TO REMAIN AND CONTINUE, MUST BE EXPOSED AND OPPOSED IMMEDIATELY! ______________________________________________________________________ The Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign Demands: Stop Punishing Those Who Are Trying to Expose Israel's Crimes, Start Holding Israel Accountable through Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Campaigns The Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign, which represents a number of major Palestinian civil society organizations and over 50 regional popular committees, wishes to protest in the strongest possible terms the arrest of two members of the Palestine 33 Committee in France. We call upon all other organizations and individuals dedicated to supporting the Palestinian struggle against Israeli Occupation to join us in offering our support to Palestine 33 and in condemning this attempt to stifle their legitimate protest. The two members of Palestine 33 are charged with placing stickers on products that were made in Israel in a supermarket in Bordeaux. The stickers call upon consumers to boycott Israeli products. The two members of the group, Sakina and Philippe Arnaud, were handcuffed, placed in custody, and searched as a result of this "crime," and charged with causing "severe damage" to the supermarket. They even had their computers confiscated from their homes by the police for further analysis. Palestine 33 is one of many groups throughout France, Europe, and the world involved in a boycott campaign against products made in Israel, as a protest against Israel's innumerable violations of international law. As a Palestinian Campaign involved in the struggle against Israeli Occupation and Apartheid, we know that such boycott campaigns are the only way to force the international community to act, in order to hold Israel accountable for its crimes. Palestine 33 has declared that they and other groups want to inform consumers of the facts about products made in Israel. They note that the International Court of Justice has declared Israel to be in violation of international law in its building of the Apartheid Wall, as well as in its settlement and occupation policies; that products produced in Israel settlements-settlements that are all illegal under international law-have been banned by the EU; and that the European Parliament has asked the EU to suspend its trade association deal as long as Israel is in violation of international law. The call for a boycott is simply an attempt to provide pressure in order to end Israel's violations and hold it accountable for its crimes. But instead of joining to condemn Israel for its crimes against the Palestinian people, the French government has shown itself willing to remain complicit with these crimes. It claims that those who are merely trying to expose and protest Israel's crimes are the "criminals." By arresting activists for doing no more than informing the public about products made by Israeli Apartheid and calling upon them to boycott these products, the French government shows itself willing to make any act of protest a crime. Further, it shows that it is more ready to continue to defend Israel's crimes against the people of Palestine than it is to listen to its own citizens, who are calling for an end to support for these crimes and demanding that Israel at last be held accountable. We at the Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign pledge our support to Palestine 33 and condemn in the strongest possible terms these attempts to silence and intimidate those who continue to protest against Israel's crimes. We express our appreciation for the grassroots support of groups in France, and throughout the world, who are initiating boycott, divestment, and sanctions campaigns against Israeli Apartheid and Occupation. It is upon this grassroots support that the people of Palestine can draw for our struggle. We loudly call upon all organizations and individuals throughout the world dedicated to justice in Palestine, and to social justice in any form, to protest against this attempt by the French government to try to stop the boycott campaign led by groups such as Palestine 33. As the struggle against Apartheid in South Africa taught us, such efforts to stifle or shut down such campaigns can never succeed, just as apartheid can never last, if we join together in the struggle to expose Israel's crimes, demand accountability for these crimes, and bring them to an end. Please send letters of support and letters of protest addressed to the French authorities to the Palestine 33 Committee at palestine33@laposte.net
For more information, please see:
http://palestine33.free.fr
|